The prospects for robust law of war tribunals are no brighter. The likelihood of any accountability for Putin or his lieutenants is woefully dim. Unfortunately, overshadowing the calls for justice is a somber, inevitable truth. Understandably, events in Ukraine now dominate the field’s attention. Though a relatively new area of practice-it is roughly 80 years old-in recent years international criminal justice practitioners achieved many successes, particularly in the Former Yugoslavia. International Criminal Justice is the field of law dedicated to investigating and prosecuting those who perpetrate unjust wars or commit law of war violations during a conflict. Putin’s attack on Ukraine was a flagrant violation of the UN Charter, and the thousands of war crimes committed by his soldiers are reminiscent of those perpetrated by the Nazis. The West Point Leiber Institute’s Ukraine Symposium and Human Rights Watch’s Ukraine Country Page are two forums providing excellent analysis of issues as they emerge.ĭemands for justice-for the victims and the perpetrators-are ubiquitous, and understandably so. Some of the world’s top international lawyers regularly analyze important law of war issues across the spectrum of that conflict. Since the war in Ukraine began nearly seven months ago, much has been written about the legal implications of Russia’s invasion. International Criminal Justice is on life support. Here’s Adam’s expert analysis and innovative recommendations: The good news? Adam offers us a substantive plan to resuscitate international justice. He traces its history–and notes the high points–but also offers a very interesting explanation for its current difficulties that you need to read. Today’s guest post is by a favorite Lawfire ® contributor and popular LENS conference speaker Adam Oler, who gives us a sober assessment of international justice.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |